@article {4043, title = {Change in research and in higher education institutions: forms of resistance in a research-action project}, journal = {Investigaciones Feministas}, volume = {12}, year = {2021}, month = {18/06/2021}, pages = {283-295}, keywords = {gender equality, knowledge-to-action gap, research performing/funding organisations, resistances, structural and cultural challenges}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.5209/infe.72054}, url = {https://revistas.ucm.es/index.php/INFE/article/view/72054}, author = {Sara Diogo and Carina Jord{\~a}o and Teresa Carvalho and Hana Himi and Maya Ashkenazi and Veronika Me{\v s}kov{\'a} and Anita Thaler and Jennifer Dahmen-Adkins} } @article {4044, title = {A Comparative Approach on the Relevance of National Gender Equality Legal Frameworks in Israel, Portugal, and Slovakia to Improve Equality at the Institutional Level}, journal = {Journal of International Women{\textquoteright}s Studies}, volume = {22}, year = {2021}, pages = {84{\textendash}102}, abstract = {

In the last decades, women{\textquoteright}s participation in Higher Education has increased in most Western countries, even if the well-known phenomena of horizontal and vertical segregation still persist (O{\textquoteright}Connor, 2017). The reasons for the persistence of these phenomena have been widely studied (Ridgeway, 2011; Pearce, Wald, \& Ballakrishnen, 2014; Rhode, 2016), highlighting the importance of defining and implementing affirmative actions to improve women{\textquoteright}s situation in Higher Education. In this context, the European Union (EU) has placed the topic of gender equality (GE) in Higher Education with high relevance in the political agenda. As a result, several research projects have been approved to design and implement Gender Equality Plans (GEPs) in Higher Education Institutions (HEIs). This paper reflects the design and implementation process of GEPs in a group of countries integrating an international project . Based on data analysis of national legal documents, this paper examines the macro factors that can contribute to improving GE at the institutional level. The empirical analysis is based on a qualitative approach sustained on the analysis of national legal documents related to the economic, political, and social domains of Portugal, Slovakia, and Israel. The comparative analysis among the countries reveals that there are relevant actions already in place in national legal frameworks that can be seen as positive to design and implement GEP in HEIs.

}, url = {https://vc.bridgew.edu/jiws/vol22/iss5/6}, author = {Sara Diogo and Carina Jord{\~a}o and Teresa Carvalho and Hana Himi and Maya Ashkenazi and Veronika Me{\v s}kov{\'a} and Z{\'e}lia Breda} } @inbook {4006, title = {Institutionalised Resistance to Gender Equality Initiatives in Swedish and Portuguese Academia}, booktitle = {Gender, Power and Higher Education in a Globalised World}, year = {2021}, pages = {226}, publisher = {Palgrave Macmillan, Cham}, organization = {Palgrave Macmillan, Cham}, edition = {P. O{\textquoteright}Connor, K. White}, abstract = {

This chapter explores institutionalised resistance to gender equality initiatives reported by 15 gender equality change agents (GECAs) in Swedish and Portuguese Higher Education (HE). Drawing on qualitative interviews with the GECAs, the study highlights similarities within the two national HE contexts, but also contextual nuances and variations. Feminist institutionalism is used as a theoretical framework which facilitates an investigation of how resistance appears embedded in the structures and processes of HE. The analysis develops the conceptual categorisation of institutionalised resistance embedded in three separate types of institutional structures and processes: (1) legitimation, (2) decision making and (3) resource allocation. The GECAs in both contexts identified the decoupling mechanisms behind these structures and processes: formal institutional rules and policies characterised by gender equality, equal opportunity and meritocracy were compromised by informal practices and routines which preserved status quo. The {\textquotedblleft}mirage of equality{\textquotedblright} was therefore a reoccurring theme in both contexts.

}, issn = {978-3-030-69686-3}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69687-0_2}, url = {https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-69687-0_2}, author = {Helen Peterson and Teresa Carvalho and Birgitta Jordansson and Maria de Lourdes Machado-Taylor} } @article {4224, title = {Leader-Expressed Humility Predicting Team Psychological Safety: A Personality Dynamics Lens}, journal = {Journal of Business Ethics}, volume = {174}, year = {2021}, pages = {669{\textendash}686}, author = {Arm{\'e}nio Rego and Ana I Melo and Dustin Bluhm and D{\'a}lcio Reis Junior} } @conference {4096, title = {Planos de Igualdade de G{\'e}nero nas Institui{\c c}{\~o}es de Ensino Superior em Portugal: A remar contra a corrente? }, booktitle = {XI Congresso Portugu{\^e}s de Sociologia: Identidades ao rubro: diferen{\c c}as, perten{\c c}as e populismos num mundo efervescente}, year = {2021}, month = {29-31 mar{\c c}o 2021}, publisher = {Associa{\c c}{\~a}o Portuguesa de Sociologia}, organization = {Associa{\c c}{\~a}o Portuguesa de Sociologia}, address = {Online Conference}, abstract = {

A igualdade de g{\'e}nero na ci{\^e}ncia e na investiga{\c c}{\~a}o {\'e} uma tem{\'a}tica importante na Uni{\~a}o Europeia (UE) e constitui um dos objetivos da {\'A}rea Europeia de Investiga{\c c}{\~a}o. A desigualdade tende a persistir em v{\'a}rios pa{\'\i}ses, prejudicando as organiza{\c c}{\~o}es, a economia e a sociedade. Para eliminar este problema, a Comiss{\~a}o Europeia tem financiado v{\'a}rios projetos de investiga{\c c}{\~a}o-a{\c c}{\~a}o que procuram estimular mudan{\c c}as institucionais duradouras atrav{\'e}s da implementa{\c c}{\~a}o de Planos de Igualdade de G{\'e}nero (GEP) nas Organiza{\c c}{\~o}es Produtoras de Investiga{\c c}{\~a}o (RPOs). A resist{\^e}ncia parece, contudo, ser um dos principais desafios {\`a} sua implementa{\c c}{\~a}o. Este estudo visa analisar as din{\^a}micas organizacionais de resist{\^e}ncia {\`a} implementa{\c c}{\~a}o dos GEP em Portugal. Partindo da experi{\^e}ncia de investigadores/as respons{\'a}veis pelo desenho, planeamento e implementa{\c c}{\~a}o destes projetos, identificam-se as principais formas de resist{\^e}ncia, discutem-se as raz{\~o}es que lhes subjazem e abordam-se algumas estrat{\'e}gias com potencial para as superar e para garantir a sustentabilidade das iniciativas. Este estudo, de natureza qualitativa, evidencia que, apesar de assumir diferentes formas e configura{\c c}{\~o}es em fun{\c c}{\~a}o dos contextos organizacionais onde s{\~a}o implementados os GEP, a resist{\^e}ncia {\'e} um problema transversal aos v{\'a}rios projetos nacionais.

}, keywords = {Ensino Superior, Investiga{\c c}{\~a}o-a{\c c}{\~a}o, Planos de Igualdade de G{\'e}nero, Resist{\^e}ncia {\`a} mudan{\c c}a}, isbn = {978-989-97981-7-5}, url = {https://aps.pt/wp-content/uploads/XI_Congresso/Sexualidade_XI-APS-71666.pdf}, author = {Carina Jord{\~a}o and Teresa Carvalho and Sara Diogo} } @conference {4094, title = {Where is Gender? A Missing Variable in Scientific Research}, booktitle = {15th International Technology, Education and Development Conference}, year = {2021}, month = {8-9 March, 2021}, publisher = {IATED Academy}, organization = {IATED Academy}, address = {Online Conference}, abstract = {

Gender Equality in science and research has become increasingly relevant within the European Union (EU) and within the European Research Area (ERA). In recent years, significant efforts have been made to achieve the three objectives set by the ERA on gender equality: increasing gender balance in research teams, increasing gender balance in decision-making, and strengthening the gender dimension in research. The work that has been performed at EU level and across ERA countries has brought some improvements, but the objective of strengthening the gender dimension in research has received little attention in several countries and, overall, the number of publications that incorporate the gender dimension remains low (EC 2019). In some countries, such as Portugal, gender in/equality continues to be seen (and handled) as an issue of (under)representation of women in research; the gender dimension in research seems thus to be sidelined. This work, carried out as part of an international H2020 funded research project (CHANGE {\textendash} CHalleNging Gender (In)Equality in science and research), seeks to bring this issue to the center of the debate. Through a comparative perspective, this study aims to explore, characterise and analyse, how a Portuguese university (University of Aveiro {\textendash} UA) has been involving the gender perspective in their research outputs in the last decades. In order to achieve the purpose of the research, the annual percentage of SCOPUS publications incorporating a gender perspective in the UA (i.e. publications which have gender, women or sex in the title, abstract or keywords) is determined and its evolution along the last decades analysed. The analysis reveals that in each year analysed, the percentage of UA SCOPUS publications with a gender focus is always below 3.5\%. The first UA publication that meets the requirements of our SCOPUS database search appeared in the year 2000 and {\textendash} as with most Portuguese public HEIs analysed in the framework of this study {\textendash} progress in recent years has been slow and oscillate between advancements and setbacks. Between 2000 and 2019 the percentage of UA SCOPUS publications incorporating the gender dimension increased only 1.91 percentage points. Taking that Gender Equality is one of the 17 Sustainable Development Goals, universities and academics need to reflect on the need to increase the integration of the gender perspective in research.

}, keywords = {european research area, gender dimension, Higher Education Institutions, Portugal, research}, isbn = {978-84-09-27666-0}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2021.1948 }, url = {https://library.iated.org/view/JORDAO2021WHE}, author = {Carina Jord{\~a}o and Sara Diogo and Teresa Carvalho} } @conference {4099, title = {Gender In/Equality in men wor(l)d{\textquoteright}s: Perceptions on the construction of a gender equal and inclusive Portuguese University}, booktitle = {3rd International Conference on Gender Research }, year = {2020}, month = {16-17 July 2020}, publisher = {ACPI Ltd. }, organization = {ACPI Ltd. }, address = {Online Conference}, abstract = {

Based in a H2020 funded project and on theoretical contributions of the feminist institutional perspective, this paper provides a comparative view between men and women on the identified values, practices and behaviours needed to the institutionalisation and promotion of gender equal and inclusive higher education institutions (HEI). This theoretical perspective grounds our comparative analysis, supported by 22 interviews with institutional key-actors: 15 men and 7 women. Being our sample constituted by both male and female interviewees of a Portuguese university can be seen as an innovative approach due to two complementary reasons. First, Portuguese HEI clearly exemplify women representation in academia, considering their significant presence and rapid growth in HEI: as the system expanded and democratised, it also became more feminised, although women are still underrepresented in top-management and leading positions, contributing to perpetuate the vertical segregation phenomenon. Second, gender issues on (Portuguese) HEI are usually approached by women, with men having a peripheral role. Towards this background, we are interested in understanding how both sexes envisage gender equality in their working place (the academia) and even to depict how men perceive their role in the construction of gender-balanced and inclusive HEI. Data analysis reveals not only differences but also similarities between men and women perceptions of the values, practices and behaviours needed to the institutionalisation and promotion of a gender equal and inclusive institution. There is a common trend to consider universities as gender neutral and to attribute the responsibility for changes to the political, social and/or cultural systems, which results from a common symbolic realm of meaning-making common to women and men. However, it is more common to find women manifesting a more positive perspective to affirmative actions at the university. Thus, one can say that women situation can justify their greater assumption of an agency perspective on institutional change.

}, keywords = {(in)equality, feminist institutional perspective, Gender, higher education, Portugal, universities}, isbn = {978-1-912764-56-3}, author = {Carina Jord{\~a}o and Teresa Carvalho and Sara Diogo and Z{\'e}lia Breda} } @conference {4098, title = {Implementing Gender Equality Plans through an action-research approach: challenges and resistances}, booktitle = {19th European Conference on Research Methodology for Business and Management Studies }, year = {2020}, month = {18-19 July 2020}, publisher = {ACPI Ltd}, organization = {ACPI Ltd}, address = {Online Conference}, abstract = {

Achieving gender equality (GE) in science and research has become an important issue in the European Union (EU) and one of the objectives of the European Research Area (ERA). Progress in this area is sluggish and difficult, with several indicators showing that women tend to remain in a disadvantage position when compared to men, despite several efforts and initiatives to correct the situation. It is widely acknowledged that gender inequality may be leading to huge losses of talent, detrimental to organisations, to the economy and to the society (European Commission 2020). To overcome this situation, the European Commission (EC) has funded several action-research projects (through FP6, FP7 and H2020) in order to accelerate and/or stimulate effective and structural institutional changes through the implementation of tailor-made Gender Equality Plans (GEPs). Several GEPs have been implemented in Research Performing Organisations (RPOs) in many countries. Although the effective impact of these plans and their contribution to the creation of more egalitarian working environments in organisations has not yet been fully determined, it seems that resistance may be one of the main obstacles to their successful implementation. This study aims to analyse the organisational dynamics of resistance to the implementation of GEPs in Portuguese RPOs. Thus, drawing on the experience of key actors directly involved in the design, planning and implementation of the GEPs, the authors identify the main forms of resistance felt and discuss the reasons underlying this resistance, while analysing some potential strategies to overcome them and to ensure the success of both gender initiatives and national projects. To achieve the objective of the work, semi-structured interviews were conducted with the Principal Investigators (PI) of three projects developed in Portuguese RPOs. In an attempt to find {\textquoteleft}meaning-oriented regularities{\textquoteright} in the data, the interviews were analysed using the {\textquoteleft}interpretative qualitative{\textquoteright} approach. The authors conclude that resistance to GE initiatives is identified in all institutional contexts but it can assume different forms and configurations.

}, keywords = {Action-research approach, Gender Equality Plans (GEP), Portugal, Resistance}, isbn = {978-1-912764-59-4}, author = {Carina Jord{\~a}o and Teresa Carvalho and Sara Diogo} } @conference {4100, title = {Learning organisations: A case study of changes in gender equality in decision-making bodies}, booktitle = {14th International Technology, Education and Development Conference}, year = {2020}, month = {2-4 March, 2020}, publisher = {IATED Academy}, organization = {IATED Academy}, address = {Valencia, Spain}, abstract = {

Despite the general legal and social environments in Europe and in Portugal being positive to the institutionalisation of equal opportunities in Higher Education Institutions (HEI), gender inequality seems to persist in stereotyped perceptions embedded within organisational cultures. The European Union (EU) has been developing several programmes to fund the promotion of Gender Equality Plans (GEP) in HEIs in the European context (European Commission, 2016; 2019).
It is encouraging to find that in some specific cases the implementation of these progresses has positive results (ERAC 2018). This is the case of the institution studied here, which committed to equality beyond rhetoric. The paper reports on a case study of best practices in promoting gender equality in decision-making bodies at the middle-management level in the University of Aveiro, in Portugal. Based on an international H2020 funded research project, the University of Aveiro has implemented GEPs resulting in an increase in the number of women in decision-making bodies. This paper seeks to explain the process of cultural change in general as well as in the rector team{\textquoteright}s attitudes, in particular, to promote progress in pursuit of gender equality in decision-making bodies.
When the project started, women constitute only 5\% of members in these middle management bodies (i.e. Deans of both university departments and polytechnic schools). One year after the implementation of the project, this percentage increased to 20\%. The paper details the several steps taken to reach this result. First, the problem was identified based on a quantitative analysis of the gender composition of decision-making bodies at UA; then, the process through which members access these bodies was also analysed. In a second stage of the project, the rector was informed and instigated to be more proactive in increase women representativeness in the following elections. Without changing the regulations, it was possible to develop informal strategies. These related with the identification of women with competencies to perform the job and with personal empowerment for them to propose themselves to the election.
Although progresses have been made, it is important to acknowledge that these initiatives are not enough to promote structural changes and more needs to be done to accelerate the pace of progress as well as to change institutional practices and individual mentalities.

}, keywords = {Decision-making bodies, gender equality, gender-equality plan, Higher Education Institutions, Portugal}, isbn = {978-84-09-17939-8}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2020.1650}, url = {https://library.iated.org/view/CARVALHO2020LEA}, author = {Teresa Carvalho and Carina Jord{\~a}o and Sara Diogo and Z{\'e}lia Breda} } @article {3902, title = {Students{\textquoteright} migration in a Portuguese hinterland public university}, journal = {Studies in Higher Education}, volume = {45}, year = {2020}, pages = {1160-1182}, chapter = {1160}, doi = {10.1080/03075079.2018.1553155}, url = {https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1553155}, author = {M. Fonseca and E. Justino and Alberto Amaral} } @article {3872, title = {Hopes, beliefs, and concerns: Narratives in German and Portuguese universities regarding Brexit}, journal = {Higher Education}, year = {2019}, doi = {doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00443-y}, author = {Seidenschnur, T. and L.G. Veiga and Jungblut, J. and A. M. Magalh{\~a}es} } @article {3864, title = {Hopes, beliefs, and concerns: Narratives in German and Portuguese universities regarding Brexit}, journal = {Higher Education}, year = {2019}, author = {Seidenschnur, T. and Veiga, Am{\'e}lia Jungblut, J. e Magalh{\~a}es, A. and Jungblut, J. and A. M. Magalh{\~a}es} } @article {3869, title = {Hopes, beliefs, and concerns: Narratives in German and Portuguese universities regarding Brexit}, journal = {Higher Education}, year = {2019}, pages = {1-18}, chapter = {1}, doi = {doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00443-y }, author = {Seidenschnur, T. and L.G. Veiga and Jungblut, J. and A. M. Magalh{\~a}es} } @proceedings {Fitsgerald_2018, title = {Assessing the severity and impact of oral mucositis after autologous transplantation for myeloma: A prospective pilot study comparing the patient-reported quality of life and objective evaluation by a healthcare professional}, number = {3}, year = {2018}, publisher = {Elsevier }, doi = {10.1016/j.bbmt.2017.12.203}, url = {https://doi.org/10.1016\%2Fj.bbmt.2017.12.203}, author = {Brynn Fitsgerald and Najla El Jurdi and Nina Dambrosio and Ali Filali-Mouhim and Iman Salem and Jude Khatib and Paolo Caimi and Rui Amaral Mendes and Mahmoud Ghannoum and Marcos Lima} } @inbook {Maria_de_Lourdes_Machado-Taylor39608296, title = {Higher education expansion in the Portuguese speaking countries: The cases of Angola, Cape Vert and Portugal}, booktitle = {Intercultural studies in higher education: Policy \& Practice}, year = {2018}, publisher = {Palgrave Publishers}, organization = {Palgrave Publishers}, address = {London}, author = {L. Cerdeira and B. G. Cabrito and Tom{\'a}s Patroc{\'\i}nio and M. L. Machado-Taylor and R. Brites and A. Brito and N. B. Vicente and N. M. Nkula and A. Buza}, editor = {A. Albuquerque and P. Jean-Jacques and N. Bagnall} } @inbook {4033, title = {The sociology of professions and the study of the academic profession}, booktitle = {Theoretical and Methodological Perspectives on Higher Education Management and Transformation : An advanced reader for PhD students}, year = {2018}, pages = {121-150}, publisher = {Tampere University Press}, organization = {Tampere University Press}, edition = {E. Pekkola, J. Kivist{\"o}, V. Kohtam{\"a}ki, Y. Cai, A. Lyytinen}, address = {Tampere, Finland}, keywords = {academic professions, akateemiset urat, ammatit, kirjallisuuskatsaukset, literature reviews, professiot, sosiologia, teoriat}, issn = {978-952-03-0842-1}, url = {http://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi:jyu-201809254231}, author = {Elias Pekkola and Teresa Carvalho and Taru Sikkinen and Jan-Erik Johansson} } @article {3567, title = {Students{\textquoteright} migration in a Portuguese hinterland public university}, journal = {Studies in Higher Education}, year = {2018}, doi = { DOI: 10.1080/03075079.2018.1553155}, url = {https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03075079.2018.1553155}, author = {M. Fonseca and E. Justino and Alberto Amaral} } @article {2695, title = {A climatology of Vintage Port quality}, journal = {International Journal of Climatology}, volume = {37}, year = {2017}, pages = {3798-3809}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4953}, author = {AC Real and J Borges and Jos{\'e} Ant{\'o}nio Sarsfield Cabral and GV Jones} } @proceedings {3525, title = {Empreendedorismo feminino e internacionaliza{\c c}{\~a}o: Um estudo bibliom{\'e}trico}, year = {2017}, publisher = {Universidade da Beira Interior}, address = {Covilh{\~a}}, issn = {978-989-8780-05-8}, author = {C. S. Marques and G. Santos and E. Justino and M. L. Machado-Taylor} } @article {3980, title = {Habilidades de conversa{\c c}{\~a}o e desenvoltura em entrevista de emprego: Aplica{\c c}{\~a}o de um programa de ensino baseado na an{\'a}lise do comportamento}, journal = {Trilhas Pedag{\'o}gicas}, volume = {6}, year = {2016}, pages = {288-305}, author = {Livia Lira de Lima Guerra and J. Aguiar and Vivian Bonani de Souza Girotti and T{\^a}mara Andrade Lindau and Rafael Paulino Juliani} } @article {Molina_Prats_2016, title = {The therapeutic effects of apigenin and dexamethasone on 5-fluorouracil-induced oral mucositis - A pilot study using a Syrian hamster model}, journal = {Journal of Oral Pathology \& Medicine}, year = {2016}, publisher = {Wiley-Blackwell}, doi = {10.1111/jop.12473}, url = {https://doi.org/10.1111\%2Fjop.12473}, author = {Patricia Molina Prats and Francisco G{\'o}mez Garcia and Francisco Martinez Diaz and Rui Amaral Mendes and Pia Lopez- Jornet} } @article {Sarsfield_Cabral, title = {Partitioning the grapevine growing season in the Douro Valley of Portugal: Accumulated heat better than calendar dates}, journal = {International Journal of Biometeorology}, volume = {59}, year = {2015}, pages = {1045-1059}, issn = {0020-7128}, doi = {10.1007/s00484-014-0918-1}, url = {http://doi.org/10.1007/s00484-014-0918-1}, author = {Jos{\'e} Ant{\'o}nio Sarsfield Cabral and AC Real and J Borges and GV Jones} } @article {1728, title = {The concept of excellence in higher education}, number = {ISBN 978-952-5539-73-8 }, year = {2014}, institution = {ENQA}, type = {web publication}, address = {Brussels}, isbn = {978-952-5539-73-8 (web publication)}, url = {http://www.enqa.eu/index.php/publications/papers-reports/occasional-papers/}, author = {M. Brusoni and M. Brusoni and Damian, R. and Grifoll, J. and Jackson, S. and Komurcugil, H., and M. Malmedy and Mataeva, O. and Motova, G. and Pisarz, S. and Pol, P. and Rostlund, A. and Soboleva, E. and Orlanda Tavares and L. Zobel} } @booklet {3740, title = {QUEST for quality for students - Survey on students{\textquoteright} perspectives}, year = {2013}, author = {Jungblut, J. and Vukasovic, M.} } @article {3191, title = {The European university landscape: A micro characterization based on evidence from the Aquameth project}, journal = { Research Policy}, volume = {40}, year = {2011}, pages = {148-164}, author = {Daraio, C. and Bonaccorsi, A. and Geuna, A. and B. Lepori and Bach, L. and Bogetoft, P. and M.F. Cardoso and Castro-Martinez, E. and Crespi, G. and I. Fernandez Lucio and Fried, H. and Garcia-Aracil, A. and Inzelt, A. and B. Jongbloed and Kempkes, G. and Llerena, P. and Matt, M. and Olivares, M. and Pohl, C. and Raty, T. and Maria Jo{\~a}o e Ma Rosa and Cl{\'a}udia Sarrico and Simar, L. and Slipersaeter, S. and P. Teixeira and Eeckaut, P.V.} } @article {RID:060816075559-21, title = {Higher education (related) choices in Portugal: Joint decisions on institution type and leaving home}, journal = {Studies in Higher Education}, volume = {36}, number = {6}, year = {2011}, pages = {689-703}, author = {C. S{\'a} and D. Dias and E. Justino and Alberto Amaral} } @article {Tavares2008, title = {Students{\textquoteright} preferences and needs in Portuguese higher education}, journal = {European Journal of Education}, volume = {43}, number = {1}, year = {2008}, pages = {107-122}, author = {A. Tavares and Orlanda Tavares and E. Justino and Alberto Amaral} } @inbook {3137, title = {Higher education and quality assessment: The many rationales for quality}, booktitle = {Embedding quality culture in higher education}, year = {2007}, pages = {6-10}, publisher = {EUA}, organization = {EUA}, address = {Brussels}, author = {Alberto Amaral and L. Harvey}, editor = {L. Bollaert and S. Brus and B. Curvale and E. Helle and H. T. Jensen and J. Komlejnovic and A. Orphanides and A. Sursock} } @inbook {Amaral, title = {Market competition, public good, and state interference}, booktitle = {Public-private dynamics in higher education. Expectations, developments and outcomes}, year = {2007}, pages = {89-110}, publisher = {Transcript Verlag}, organization = {Transcript Verlag}, address = {Bielefeld}, doi = {10.14361/9783839407523-004}, url = {https://doi.org/10.14361\%2F9783839407523-004}, author = {Alberto Amaral and A. M. Magalh{\~a}es}, editor = {J. Enders and B. Jongbloed} } @inbook {3134, title = {A broader church? Expansion, access and cost-sharing in Portuguese higher education}, booktitle = {Cost-sharing and accessibility in higher education: A fairer deal?}, year = {2006}, pages = {241-264}, publisher = {Springer-Kluwer}, organization = {Springer-Kluwer}, address = {Dordrecht}, author = {P. Teixeira and Maria Jo{\~a}o e Ma Rosa and Alberto Amaral}, editor = {P. Teixeira and B. Johnstone and Maria Jo{\~a}o e Ma Rosa and J. Vossensteijn} } @book {3189, title = {Cost-sharing and accessibility in higher education {\textendash} A fairer deal?}, year = {2006}, publisher = {Springer}, organization = {Springer}, address = {Dordrecht}, editor = {P. Teixeira and B. Johnstone and H. Vossensteyn and Maria Jo{\~a}o e Ma Rosa} } @inbook {3128, title = {Conclusion}, booktitle = {Markets in higher education: Rhetoric or reality?}, year = {2004}, pages = {327-352}, publisher = {Kluwer}, organization = {Kluwer}, address = {Dordrecht}, author = {D. Dill and P. Teixeira and B. Jongbloed and Alberto Amaral}, editor = {P. Teixeira and B. Jongbloed and D. Dill and Alberto Amaral} } @inbook {3126, title = {Introduction}, booktitle = {Markets in higher education: Rhetoric or reality?}, year = {2004}, pages = {1-12}, publisher = {Kluwer}, organization = {Kluwer}, address = {Dordrecht}, author = {P. Teixeira and B. Jongbloed and Alberto Amaral and D. Dill}, editor = {P. Teixeira and B. Jongbloed and D. Dill and Alberto Amaral} } @book {3091, title = {Markets in higher education: Rhetoric or reallity?}, year = {2004}, publisher = {Kluwer}, organization = {Kluwer}, address = {Dordrecht}, editor = {P. Teixeira and B. Jongbloed and D. Dill and Alberto Amaral} } @inbook {3127, title = {Is there a higher education market in Portugal?}, booktitle = {Markets in higher education: Rhetoric or reality?}, year = {2004}, pages = {291-310}, publisher = {Kluwer}, organization = {Kluwer}, address = {Dordrecht}, author = {P. Teixeira and Maria Jo{\~a}o e Ma Rosa and Alberto Amaral}, editor = {P. Teixeira and B. Jongbloed and D. Dill and Alberto Amaral} } @inbook {3116, title = {The emergent role of external stakeholders in European higher education governance}, booktitle = {Governing higher education: National perspectives on institutional governance}, year = {2002}, pages = {1-22}, publisher = {Kluwer}, organization = {Kluwer}, address = {Dordrecht}, author = {Alberto Amaral and A. M. Magalh{\~a}es}, editor = {Alberto Amaral and A. G. Jones and B. Karseth} } @inbook {3117, title = {Governing higher education: Comparing national perspectives}, booktitle = {Governing higher education: National perspectives on institutional governance}, year = {2002}, pages = {279-298}, publisher = {Springer}, organization = {Springer}, address = {Dordrecht}, author = {Alberto Amaral and A. G. Jones and B. Karseth}, editor = {Alberto Amaral and A. G. Jones and B. Karseth} } @book {3088, title = {Governing higher education: National perspectives on institutional governance}, year = {2002}, publisher = {Springer}, organization = {Springer}, address = {Dordrecht}, author = {Alberto Amaral and A. G. Jones and B. Karseth} }